Posted tagged ‘cold remedies’

Phenylephrine: A placebo you don’t need

November 2, 2015

The Pediatric Insider

© 2015 Roy Benaroch, MD

Doctors, myself included, are dismissive of placebos. “That doesn’t work,” we say, referring to countless therapies that have no benefit over fake therapies (placebos), including pediatric chiropractic, homeopathy, and acupuncture.

We need to be honest. We have our placebos, too—pushed by modern pharmaceutical companies and genuine medical doctors. Maybe we ought to spend more time cleaning up what we do rather than pointing fingers at them.

Case in point: phenylephrine, marketed as a nasal decongestant. To understand how phenylephrine (PE) became so popular, we’ll have to go backwards a bit, to 1994, when the FDA published a list of nasal decongestant products that it considered safe and effective. Anything on “the list” could be sold without further FDA review. Included on that list were two oral decongestants: phenylephrine and pseudoephedrine (commonly known by the brand name Sudafed), which was far more popular.

In the 2000’s, to combat the epidemic of methamphetamine abuse, Congress attached an amendment to the Patriot Act (yes, that Patriot Act), restricting the sale of pseudoephedrine-containing medications. You could still buy them, but in limited quantities, and you had to present your ID to the pharmacist so your purchases could be recorded and tracked. All pseudoephedrine-containing products were pulled from the shelves. And, predictably, sales suffered. People didn’t want the bother of confronting a pharmacist to buy Sudafed, and pharmacists frankly had better things to do with their time than check ID for $6 purchases.

The marketers, predictably, won: a whole slew of new products, containing PE instead of pseudoephedrine, hit the market, prominently displayed on store shelves. Names like “Sudafed PE” minimized the change in the active ingredients, relying on well-known brand names to sell the product. Within a few years, PE-containing products far outsold the hidden pseudoephedine products. And everyone was happy.

Well, almost everyone. If you had a stuffy nose, you were most certainly not happy. Because oral phenylephrine never actually worked. A 2007 review showed that the PE was no better than placebo, and the FDA considered removing it from the allowed-drugs monograph—but they were swayed by a different published analysis showing a small but positive effect of PE on one measure of nasal congestion. That study has been criticized on many grounds, including that it cherry-picked positive studies and ignored evidence that weighed against PE. Still, the FDA allowed PE to continue to be sold and advertised as effective—though they did request a solid, placebo-controlled study to settle the issue.

Now, finally, in 2015, a placebo-controlled study of PE has finally been published. It’s fairly large, using 539 adults, and it looked at multiple doses sizes of PE compared to placebo top treat seasonal allergic rhinitis. The results are unequivocal: PE, at every dose, works no better than placebo—meaning it doesn’t work at all. About 18% of study participants developed side effects, mostly headache (none were serious.)

I don’t know what the FDA is going to do with this information. They asked for it, and now they’ve got it. Perhaps they’ll pull PE from the shelves. Perhaps they’ll ask for more studies. Maybe they’ll say that the drug companies can no longer sell PE for allergies, but can continue to sell them for congestion caused by a common cold (there’s no evidence it works for that, either, but there are no big robust placebo controlled studies to cite.) For the time being, PE, the placebo, continues to be sold, and continues to be recommended by physicians. It’s hard to change habits.

If you’ve got a congested nose, there are some things that do work. Congestion can be relieved by saline washes or sprays or a steamy shower. If allergies are the culprit, a nasal steroid spray is very effective. Pseudoephedine (Sudafed) is still out there, though you have to ask for it. Topical nasal decongestant sprays (like Afrin) work, too, though should typically be used for only a few days.

Or, go with a placebo. If that’s your style, choose something safe, like a homeopathic product. It won’t relieve congestion any better than plain water, but at least it won’t hurt anything but your wallet. That’s more than I can say for phenylephrine and our other real-medicine-placebos.

Short questions on cramps, SIDS, lumps, spatulas, and suckers

October 6, 2010

The Pediatric Insider

© 2010 Roy Benaroch, MD

A quick-fire post! Time to clear out the inbox…

Michelle: “Is it possible for girls to have cramps before (about a year or so) they start their period?”

I don’t think that’s likely, at least not that far beforehand. Constipation, stress, poor diet (too much processed food, not enough fresh fruits/vegs/water), not enough exercise, and lactose intolerance would be far more likely.

L asked: “Why do some children develop knots in the leg after immunization injections?”

They’re called “sterile abscesses”, which isn’t a great name—they’re not really abscesses at all. The knots are caused by a local inflammatory reaction, and they’re more likely to occur if the needle was too short or if the child jerked away. The knots don’t really mean anything, and don’t interfere with the way the vaccine works. Expect them to gradually go away in a few months.

Sheri: “My 6 1/2 month old recently started sleeping on his stomach. I put him down on his back half swaddled with his arms out for every sleep. He cries, moves around and eventually rolls over on his stomach for the rest of the night. I know this increases his risk of SIDS but I can’t stop him from rolling over. Can I stop worrying?”

Yes. Stop worrying. The “back to sleep” campaign, which has reduced SIDS by about 50%, encourages parents to put babies on their backs to sleep—but never included any instructions to keep babies on their backs. Once your child can roll to him stomach, leave him there. You don’t have to stand aside his crib all night with a spatula, flipping him back over.

Melissa: “Hi- I was wondering what your opinion was on all of the antibacterial products that are available now and so widely used.”

No good studies have been able to confirm that antibacterial-coated products have been able to reduce infections. I doubt they could have any net effect on the germs that children are exposed to, with the single exception of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Those have been shown to reduce infections among health care works and in day cares. You want to avoid infections? Try:

  • Good handwashing
  • Frequent use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers
  • Vaccines against preventable illnesses like influenza
  • Keeping your children away from sick children
  • A good night’s sleep

Antibacterial surfaces, special vitamin supplements (including those “developed by a teacher” or sold by olympians), herbs, wands, sprays, magic air ionizers, and plenty of other gizmos and elixirs are big money-makers for some, and big money-wasters for others. Don’t be a sucker.